TY - THES T1 - Variability of Microwave Backscatter from Loblolly Pine Forest and the Implications for Forest Biomass Estimation with Imaging Radar Y1 - 1999 A1 - Day, J. L. AB - The microwave backscatter coefficient (sigma-0) of forest, as measured by imaging radar, varies depending on forest structure and biomass. It may, therefore, be possible to estimate forest biomass and other biophysical properties from radar data. Sigma-0 also varies in response to other forest and radar variables, including ground surface roughness and moisture, forest phenology and radar calibration. These extraneous sources of sigma-0 variation can interfere with biomass estimation. In this dissertation, I examine variability of sigma-0 for loblolly pine stands in Duke Forest, North Carolina, and assess the impact of variability on accuracy of biomass estimation. A microwave canopy backscatter model was used to study how sigma-0 of a forest changes as forest floor properties vary. L- and C-band backscatter was simulated at 3 polarizations and 3 radar incidence angles for pine stands at 3 biomass levels, while 5 ground surface parameters were varied over a range of realistic values, as determined from field data. The surface parameters are litter depth and moisture content, soil RMS height and correlation length, and soil moisture content. For incidence angles of 20-40 deg., L-HH varied by 5.3-9.6 dB as the surface parameters varied over their range, whereas L-VV varied by 3.7-4.5 dB. C-HH and C-VV were sensitive to the surface only at steep incidence (20-30 deg.) for the lowest biomass stand studied. L-HV and C-HV were relatively insensitive to the surface. Variation of actual, measured sigma-0 was examined for C- and L-band backscatter acquired over 21 loblolly stands in the biomass range of 3.5-44.5 kg/@ m sup 2@ during 10 passes of NASA's Shuttle Imaging Radar in April and October, 1994. Within any radar band-polarization combination and data take, the maximum sigma-0 range among the stands was 3.6 dB; in most cases it was 2-3 dB. RMS variation of mean forest sigma-0 for the 10 data takes (after correcting for incidence angle) was 0.4-0.7 dB, which is comparable to the standard deviation of sigma-0 among the 21 stands. Sigma-0 increased @ approx @1 dB when the canopy was wet, but variation of sigma-0 with surface moisture was not separable from other factors. Biomass to sigma-0 correlations were affected by radar look direction and appear unrelated to incidence angle or soil moisture. Multiple linear regressions of biomass versus sigma-0 (adjusted to equalize mean forest sigma-0 among data takes), yielded adjusted R-squared values up to 0.57. The regression models varied, the best model for each data take requiring a different combination of SIR-C bands. RMS error of biomass estimation decreased with the number of bands included in the model for estimates based on the regression data, but increased with the number of bands included for estimates made from data acquired in different shuttle passes. Analysis of the propagation of sigma-0 variance through the linear regression models confirms that estimation error increases with model size and sigma-0 variability. ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Sensitivity of modeled C- and L-band radar backscatter to ground surface parameters in Loblolly pine forest JF - Remote Sensing of Environment Y1 - 1998 A1 - Wang, Y. A1 - Day, J. L. A1 - Davis, F. W. KW - Duke Forest VL - 66 ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Modeling L-Band Radar Backscatter of Alaskan Boreal Forest JF - IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing Y1 - 1993 A1 - Wang, Y. A1 - Day, J. L. A1 - Davis, F. W. A1 - Melack, J. M. KW - Electrical & electronic. KW - Reprint available from: Wang Y. UNIV CALIF SANTA BARBARA, CTR REMOTE KW - SENSING & ENVIRONM OPT, SANTA BARBARA, CA 93106, USA. KW - Vegetation. Layer. AB - Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data were acquired over Bonanza Creek Experimental Forest (Alaska) in March 1988 under thawed and frozen conditions. For five stands analyzed, L-band backscatter at 42-degrees-45-degrees incidence angle was 2.7-6.9 dB smaller under frozen than under thawed conditions for white spruce and balsam poplar, with the largest difference at HV and the smallest at HH polarization. The differences were smaller for a stand of small black spruce. The VV-HH phase differences observed by SAR were almost-equal-to 0-degrees for all the stands. Ground data were used to parameterize the Santa Barbara canopy backscatter model. For the white spruce and balsam poplar stands under thawed conditions, simulations agreed with the SAR data within the calibration uncertainty. The model underestimated the HH, HV, and VV backscatter for all five stands under frozen conditions, and for the black spruce stand under thawed conditions. The modeled VV-HH phase differences were close to 0-degrees for all the stands except the black spruce stand. The discrepancies in model predictions of backscatter and phase difference were attributed to inadequate surface backscatter modeling. Model results supported the hypothesis that the weaker backscatter from frozen, as compared with thawed stands, was because of the smaller dielectric constant of the frozen trees. [References: 15] 15 VL - 31 N1 - English Article Current Contents/Engineering, Technology & Applied Sciences. Reprint available from: Wang Y UNIV CALIF SANTA BARBARA CTR REMOTE SENSING & ENVIRONM OPT SANTA BARBARA, CA 93106 USA UNIV CALIF SANTA BARBARA DEPT GEOG SANTA BARBARA, CA 93106 USA UNIV CALIF SANTA BARBARA DEPT BIOL SCI SANTA BARBARA, CA 93106 USA 0003 ER -