Status Assignment by State

STATES
Land Manager Land Management Type WA OR CA ID NV UT MT WY CO
Key attribute(s)
OWN.TYPE & GAPCODE Owner & Mgt_Code MATYPE & STATUS Ownname & Smatype & Protection User & Names User & Names Owner SMA1 & PROSTAT Owner & Manager
BLM non-designated 2, 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
ACEC 2 1, 2 - 2 2 - 2 3 -> 2 -
RNA - 1, 2 - - - - - - -
wilderness 1, 2 - - - - - - - -
Wilderness Study Area - 1, 2, 3 - - - - - - -
Bureau of Reclamation all 4 4 - 1, 4 - - - 3 -> 4 -
DoD/CoE military reservation 4 4 4 4 4 4 - 3 -> 4 -
RNA - 1 - - - - - - -
DOE all 2, 4 - - 2 ???? - - - - -
USFS non-designated 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
RNA - 1 1 1 - - - 1 -
wilderness - - 1 - 1 - - 1 -
USFWS National Wildlife Refuge 2 1, 2, 3 - 2 2 - - 1, 3 ??? -
RNA - 1 - - - - - - -
NPS National Park - 1 - - - - - - -
National Monument - - - 1 - - - 1 -
National Rec Area - - - - - - 2 2 -
Tribal Lands all 4 3 -> 4 4 4 4 - 4 4 -
State misc state lands, incl. school lands, universities, corrections 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3, 4 4
Fish and Game or Wildlife 2 2, 3, 4 2 2 - 2 - - 2
Parks and Recreation 2 1, 2, 3, 4 - 2 - - - - -
Natural Resources 2, 3 - - - - - - - -
County or Regional parks - - - - 3 - - - -
Private non-designated 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1, 2, 3, 4 ??? 4
TNC preserves 2 1, 2 - - - - - - -
Water
- 4 -> 0 - 0 0 0 0 1-4 -> 0 -

Notes

WA -ftp'ed from WA-GAP, who did their own status assignments

CA - from CA-GAP, cross-walked to standard GAP ratings

ID - ftp'ed from GAP home page, used their Protection attribute for status 1 and 2, I assigned status 3 and 4 as per GAP standards

NV and UT - ftp'ed from GAP home page, I assigned status ratings based on GAP standards

MT - ftp'ed ownership from NSDI node, I assigned status per GAP standards

WY - ftp'ed from WY-GAP, who did their own status assignments, I made changes as noted for consistency

CO - ftp'ed from GAP home page?, I assigned status per GAP standards

OR- ftp'ed from Defenders of Wildlife, I cross-walked their 1-10 rating to 1-4 GAP status codes with 9-10 - > 1, 7-8 -> 2, 5-6 -> 3, and 0-4 -> 4. Note that their ratings include condition and size factors.

Changes I made to state status assignments to be regionally consistent are shown with original -> new status codes.