A multi-scale conservation assessment of plant communities
in Southern California
Peter Anthony Stine
Landscape ecology and conservation biology are integrally
tied with geographic analysis and an understanding of the spatial
relationships of the biological and physical components of the natural
world. This dissertation examines the Southern California ecoregion
at different resolutions with the purpose of assessing the conservation
status and needs of this area's natural vegetation communities.
The first section presents, in summary form, a regional
assessment of the conservation status of terrestrial plant communities
in Southwestern California using the Gap Analysis method. The practical
constraints imposed by the size of the study area (34,000 km2), combined
with the coarse-scale overview provided by Gap coverages, dictate
a relatively large minimum mapping unit (100 hectares) and fairly
general classification (76 dominant species) for the vegetation GIS
database employed in this study.
Land ownership/management profiles provide a crude
measure of major terrestrial communities at risk nw or in the near-term
future. Results of an analysis of vegetation communities and land
ownership/management profiles confirm current concern for some communities
currently regarded as at risk and provide an indication of communities
that could be ten or twenty years from now. Communities potentially
at risk in the future include all grassland dominated communities,
many of the oak woodland communities, and some of the chaparral communities
found at lower elevations are included.
The second main chapter examines the comparative utility
of vegetation maps, prepared with different spatial resolutions. This
is accomplished through comparison of the Gap data for western San
Diego County with two other data sets that had mapped vegetation at
approximately 100 times greater spatial resolution (mimimum mapping
unit of roughly one hectare). Overlay of the three different representations
shows patterns of disagreement that arise from many different sources.
Despite these apparent disagreements the Gap data set captures over
90% of the larger stands of vegetation that it is intended to find.
However, finer grain representation of landscape features do not necessarily
nest directly inside the coarse-grain representation.
The third main chapter describes a GIS model developed
to provide a mapped-based characterization of potential long-term
conservation value of coastal sage scrub habitat. The model developed
is based on application of the Natural Communities Conservation Planning
program Conservation Guidelines. The criteria presented in these guidelines
are spatial in nature and were well-suited to the development of the
GIS model.
The larger patches of habitat in the study area were
examined for how they are shaped and connected to one and other. Investigations
into potential landscape linkages (using GIS modeling techniques)
show some locations still have a considerable number of viable options
for biologically sound linkages, other are already so fragmented that
the best opportunities for landscape linkages are long, narrow, and
fragmented.
The spatial/geometric criteria used in the model (e.g.
patch size, adjacency, linkage) provide important insights to regional
reserve design efforts. Although they are general in nature, they
are reasonably simple to apply and most conservation biologists agree
they will provide robust results. This kind of model needs to be tested
with random transect data on the distribution and abundance of the
target species to determine relative value of higher potential habitats,
as rated by the model, in relation to habitats actually supporting
viable populations. Field testing of such a model was not accomplished
as part of this dissertation and is recommended for future research.
The major conclusions reached in this dissertation
include 1) Gap Analysis is an acceptable and important component of
ecological analysis over the domain of an ecoregion; although more
finely resolved analysis can identify areas outside of those represented
in Gap, these areas are in general not crucial to regional reserve
design requirements, and 3) simple, spatially defined GIS models offer
a means of prioritizing lands under consideration for a regional reserve
system.
Each of the chapters deals with, in some substative
way, the relationship between the scale of investigation (i.e. what
and how we measure features on the landscape) and what our subsequent
analyses can tell us (i.e. interpretation of what we measure). It
is important for us to review and understand the assumptions we must
make when we use map (i.e. GIS) data to represent the multitude of
landscape features.