CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN REMOTELY SENSED DATA AND LAND
SURFACE ENERGY BALANCE OVER A TALLGRASS PRAIRIE
FRIEDL, MARK ANDREW, 1993
PhD Dissertation, Department of Geography, University of California,
Santa Barbara. 185 pp.
This research explores relationships among remotely
sensed data and land surface energy balance components over a tallgrass
prairie site in northeastern Kansas. An empirical analysis of contemporaneous
measurements of land surface energy balance components and remotely
sensed data focussed on the role of spatial variation in percent canopy
cover versus spatial variation in surface energy balance as the causal
mechanisms contributing to spatial variance in $T/sb[s]$. Next, an
invertible two-layer energy balance model was developed that explicitly
accounts for the unique microclimate of the grassland canopies present
at the study site. Finally, instantaneous area-integrated fluxes estimated
from ground stations distributed across the study site were compared
with estimates calculated by running the energy balance model using
a hybrid stratification-modeling app=
roach, where the input data to the model were stratified by burning
treatment. Land surface energy balance showed little statistical association
with $T/sb[s].$ Spatial variation in $T/sb[s]$ was primarily a function
of spatial variation in the fraction of exposed soils, which tended
to be warmer than the overlying vegetation canopies. The two-layer
energy balance model reproduced observed fluxes with good accuracy
at individual surface flux sites using in-situ data, but exhibited
moderate sensitivity to uncertainty in canopy stomatal resistance
and emissivity for both the soil and canopy. Comparison of observed
fluxes over individual surface flux sites with estimates modeled using
remotely sensed data showed significant scatter, but overall good
agreement. Estimates of area-integrated fluxes calculated using random
samples of remotely sensed data exhibited significant time and flux
dependent differences from area-integrated fluxes calculated from
ground station data. The causes of these discrepancies probably lie
in a combination of effects resulting from errors in model specification
and parameterization, and effects associated with the positioning
of surface flux stations in misrepresentative areas within the study
site.