Mapping
and Monitoring Regional Patterns of Species Richness from Geographic
Information
David
Michael Stoms
Biological
diversity has become a major scientific and political issue, producing
an urgent need for inventory and monitoring programs. Remote sensing
provides tools to satisfy part of this need, but there has been
no scientific framework for guiding its application in biodiversity
assessments. A research agenda is proposed to expand our knowledge
of the role remote sensing might play in providing improved information
on the spatial distribution of species richness and its ecological
determinants, and the response of these ecological factors to
global change. Many physical and biological factors that are correlated
with species richness have been mapped with remote sensing, including
landscape geometry, primary productivity, and evapotranspiration.
Additional research is required to apply remote sensing methods
to the assessment of biodiversity in the context of earth system
science and global change programs.
Sensitivity
of maps of predicted species richness to spatial scale and habitat
map generalization and accuracy were examined by means of a geographic
information system (GIS) sensitivity analysis. Wildlife-habitat
relationships (WHR) models were integrated with a map of habitats
to predict species number within uniform grid cells for two distinct
ecoregions in Idaho. Patterns of richness varied unpredictably
with size of the spatial sampling units because of the complex
interaction of factors that affect richness. For statewide Gap
Analysis, a range of grid sizes between 10-100,000 ha are recommended
for the Rocky Mountain Forest ecoregion and 10-60,000 ha for the
Intermountain Sagebrush ecoregion. Contiguous, non-overlapping
grids provide adequate sampling density.
Another
GIS sensitivity analysis ascertained the effects of the level
of generalization (minimum mapping unit) and accuracy of the habitat
map on the predicted distribution of richness in the southern
Sierra Nevada, California. Predicted richness declines monotonically
as the habitat map is generalized, due to reduction in the number
of habitat types mapped in a quadrat. Misclassification had the
opposite effect of predicting more species than the baseline model.
Both factors produced changes in the grid cells predicted as having
the most species. It is expected that these effects diminish as
sampling unit size increases.