Vegetation and Floristic Diversity in the Mojave Desert
of California: A Regional Conservation Evaluation
Kathryn Alice Thomas
The Mojave Desert in California is currently the focus
of conservation and ecosystem management planning efforts, all of
which have a common need for biological data. One such effort, the
Gap Analysis Program (GAP) provided a mechanism to examine both basic
and applied biogeographical issues in the Mojave. Three objectives
were accomplished: the development of a GIS based coverage of Mojave
vegetation, a new analysis of a tabular database of Mojave flora,
and a region-wide conservation assessment.
A Mojave vegetation coverage was created using existing
subregional vegetation maps, updated with 1990 Landsat Thematic Mapper
imagery. Vegetation classification for each mapping source was cross
referenced to the Holland (1986) system. Extensive field checking
was conducted to validate the cross-referencing and to update map
units where necessary. The reliability of each map unit in the vegetation
coverage was indicated with a qualitatively derived confidence score.
A quantitative accuracy assessment was made for a subregion of the
Mojave using existing plot data. The results of this accuracy assessment
were used to calibrate the confidence score and provide an estimate
of accuracy across the entire coverage. The vegetation coverage provides
the most current regional view of Mojave vegetation.
The Lum database, which provides a description of
the occurrence and various floristic properties of Californian species,
was subsampled for the Mojave. Tabular analysis of the database shows
the Mojave to support approximately 1150 species, which is proportional
to its area compared to the rest of the state. Life-form distribution
was shown to correlate with regional precipitation patterns: annuals
predominate in the west and herbaceous perennials in the east and
north. Cover types are distinct within subregions and often between
subregions, as determined by Jaccard's similarity coefficient. Cluster
analysis suggests that a two and/or five subregion division of the
Mojave could serve to geographically represent species variation.
A conservation evaluation was made of the Mojave using
the vegetation coverage, regionalized by floristic subregions. The
coverage was overlain with a land ownership map that had been reclassified
to three levels of biodiversity management. Management status of the
various cover types was evaluated and eight vulnerable cover types
were identified using a three part criteria. Seven areas were selected
as candidate areas for further conservation effort.