@article {542,
	title = {Implementation of State Wildlife Action Plans: Conservation impacts, challenges and enabling mechanisms},
	journal = {Gap Analysis Bulletin},
	volume = {17},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {30-32},
	keywords = {SWAP state wildlife action plans distributed graduate seminar gap analysis GAP},
	author = {Stoms, D. M. and Davis, F. W. and Scott, J. M.}
}
@inbook {352,
	title = {Biodiversity conflict analysis at multiple spatial scales},
	booktitle = {Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale},
	year = {2002},
	pages = {229-239},
	publisher = {Island Press},
	organization = {Island Press},
	address = {Washington, DC},
	author = {Cogan, C. B.},
	editor = {Scott, J. M. and Heglund, P. J. and Morrison, M. L. and Haufler, J. and Raphael, M. G. and Wall, W. A. and Samson, F. B.}
}
@inbook {613,
	title = {Biodiversity conflict analysis at multiple spatial scales},
	booktitle = {Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale},
	year = {2002},
	month = {2002},
	pages = {229-239},
	publisher = {Island Press},
	organization = {Island Press},
	address = {Washington, DC},
	url = {http://www.ets.uidaho.edu/coop/1999_symposium.htm},
	author = {Cogan, C. B.},
	editor = {Scott, J. M. and Heglund, P. J. and Morrison, M. L. and Haufler, J. and Raphael, M. G. and Wall, W. A. and Samson, F. B.}
}
@inbook {435,
	title = {Owning up to our responsibilities: Who owns lands important for biodiversity?},
	booktitle = {Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States},
	year = {2000},
	pages = {275-300},
	publisher = {Oxford University Press},
	organization = {Oxford University Press},
	address = {Oxford},
	author = {Groves, C. R. and Kutner, L. S. and Stoms, D. M. and Muray, M. P. and Scott, J. M. and Schafale, M. and Weakley, A. S. and Pressey, R. L.},
	editor = {Stein, B. A. and Kutner, L. S. and Adams, J. S.}
}
@inbook {693,
	title = {Owning up to our responsibilities: Who owns lands important for biodiversity?},
	booktitle = {Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States},
	year = {2000},
	month = {2000},
	pages = {275-300},
	publisher = {Oxford University Press},
	organization = {Oxford University Press},
	address = {Oxford},
	url = {http://www.abi.org/pheritage-es.htm},
	author = {Groves, C. R. and Kutner, L. S. and Stoms, D. M. and Muray, M. P. and Scott, J. M. and Schafale, M. and Weakley, A. S. and Pressey, R. L.},
	editor = {Stein, B. A. and Kutner, L. S. and Adams, J. S.}
}
@inbook {565,
	title = {Applications of Gap Analysis data in the Mojave Desert of California},
	booktitle = {Gap Analysis: A Landscape Approach to Biodiversity Planning},
	year = {1996},
	pages = {209-219},
	publisher = {American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing},
	organization = {American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing},
	address = {Bethesda, MD},
	author = {Thomas, K. A. and Davis, F. W.},
	editor = {Scott, J. M. and Tear, T. H. and Davis, F. W.}
}
@inbook {809,
	title = {Applications of Gap Analysis data in the Mojave Desert of California},
	booktitle = {Gap Analysis: A Landscape Approach to Biodiversity Planning},
	year = {1996},
	month = {1996},
	pages = {209-219},
	publisher = {American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing},
	organization = {American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing},
	address = {Bethesda, MD},
	author = {Thomas, K. A. and Davis, F. W.},
	editor = {Scott, J. M. and Tear, T. H. and Davis, F. W.}
}
@inbook {516,
	title = {Comparative utility of vegetation maps of different resolutions for conservation planning},
	booktitle = {Biodiversity in Managed Landscapes: Theory and Practice},
	year = {1996},
	pages = {210-220},
	publisher = {Oxford University Press},
	organization = {Oxford University Press},
	address = {New York},
	author = {Stine, P. A. and Davis, F. W. and Csuti, B. and Scott, J. M.},
	editor = {Szaro, R. C. and Johnston, D. W.}
}
@inbook {761,
	title = {Comparative utility of vegetation maps of different resolutions for conservation planning},
	booktitle = {Biodiversity in Managed Landscapes: Theory and Practice},
	year = {1996},
	month = {1996},
	pages = {210-220},
	publisher = {Oxford University Press},
	organization = {Oxford University Press},
	address = {New York},
	author = {Stine, P. A. and Davis, F. W. and Csuti, B. and Scott, J. M.},
	editor = {Szaro, R. C. and Johnston, D. W.}
}
@inbook {391,
	title = {A spatial analytical hierarchy for Gap Analysis},
	booktitle = {Gap Analysis: A Landscape Approach to Biodiversity Planning},
	year = {1996},
	pages = {15-24},
	publisher = {American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing},
	organization = {American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing},
	address = {Bethesda, MD},
	abstract = {Representation in the nature reserve system is determined by comparing the distribution of vegetation and vertebrates with that of land ownership and management over a region of interest. Locating potential places to increase representation is typically done by a systematic selection algorithm over a set of spatial units larger than the landscape units of the vegetation map. The landscape is thus the basic spatial unit at which biodiversity data are compiled for Gap Analysis. However, it is only one of four levels of spatial entity that must be explicitly defined in order to complete a Gap Analysis. We refer to these entities as the planning region, the planning unit, the landscape, and the landscape feature. The objective of this paper is to describe a spatial analytical hierarchy for Gap Analysis based on these four entities. Within this broader theme we also present results of a more focused analysis on the effect of planning unit size on the selection of priority conservation areas in southwestern California.},
	keywords = {gap analysis, reserve selection, scale},
	author = {Davis, F. W. and Stoms, D. M.},
	editor = {Scott, J. M. and Tear, T. H. and Davis, F. W.}
}
@inbook {650,
	title = {A spatial analytical hierarchy for Gap Analysis},
	booktitle = {Gap Analysis: A Landscape Approach to Biodiversity Planning},
	year = {1996},
	month = {1996},
	pages = {15-24},
	publisher = {American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing},
	organization = {American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing},
	address = {Bethesda, MD},
	abstract = {Representation in the nature reserve system is determined by comparing the distribution of vegetation and vertebrates with that of land ownership and management over a region of interest. Locating potential places to increase representation is typically done by a systematic selection algorithm over a set of spatial units larger than the landscape units of the vegetation map. The landscape is thus the basic spatial unit at which biodiversity data are compiled for Gap Analysis. However, it is only one of four levels of spatial entity that must be explicitly defined in order to complete a Gap Analysis. We refer to these entities as the planning region, the planning unit, the landscape, and the landscape feature. The objective of this paper is to describe a spatial analytical hierarchy for Gap Analysis based on these four entities. Within this broader theme we also present results of a more focused analysis on the effect of planning unit size on the selection of priority conservation areas in southwestern California.},
	keywords = {gap analysis, scale, reserve selection},
	author = {Davis, F. W. and Stoms, D. M.},
	editor = {Scott, J. M. and Tear, T. H. and Davis, F. W.}
}
@article {748,
	title = {Gap analysis: A geographic approach to protection of biological diversity},
	journal = {Wildlife Monographs},
	volume = {123},
	year = {1993},
	month = {1993},
	pages = {1-41},
	url = {http://fiesta.bren.ucsb.edu/~fd/Pubs/scott_et_al93.pdf},
	author = {Scott, J. M. and Davis, F. and Csuti, B. and Noss, R. and Butterfield, B. and Groves, C. and Anderson, H. and Caicco, S. and D{\textquoteright}Erchia, F. and T. C. Edwards, Jr. and Ulliman, J. and Wright, R. G.}
}
@article {782,
	title = {Geographic analysis of California condor sighting data},
	journal = {Conservation Biology},
	volume = {7},
	year = {1993},
	month = {1993},
	pages = {148-159},
	abstract = {Observation and habitat data were compiled and analyzed in conjunction with recovery planning for the endangered California Condor (Gymnogyps californianus). A geographic information system (GIS) was used to provide a quantitative inventory of recent historical Condor habitats, to measure the association of Condor activity patterns and mapped habitat variables, and to examine spatio-temporal changes in the range of the species during its decline. Only five percent of the study area within the historic range is now used for urban or cultivated agricultural purposes. Observations of Condor feeding perching, and nesting were nonrandomly associated with mapped land cover, in agreement with life history information for the species. The precipitous decline in numbers of Condors in this century produced only a small reduction in the limits of the observed species {\textquoteright}range, as individual birds continued to forage over most of the range. Some critical risk factors such as shooting and lead poisoning are difficult to map and bave not been included in the database Besides the applications demonstrated in this case study, GIS can be a valuable tool for recovery planning, in the design of stratified sampling schemes, or for extrapolation of habitat models over unsurveyed regions. We conclude with recommendations from this case study regarding when to consider using GIS and the importance of pilot studies and sensitivity analysis.},
	keywords = {habitat suitability, sensitivity analysis},
	url = {<Go to ISI>://A1993KR98600021},
	author = {Stoms, D. M. and Davis, F. W. and Cogan, C. B. and Painho, M. O. and Duncan, B. W. and Scepan, J. and Scott, J. M.}
}
@inbook {501,
	title = {Gap analysis: an application of Geographic Information Systems for wildlife species},
	booktitle = {Challenges in the Conservation of Biological Resources: A Practitioner{\textquoteright}s Guide},
	year = {1991},
	pages = {167-180},
	publisher = {Westview Press},
	organization = {Westview Press},
	address = {Boulder, Colorado},
	author = {Scott, J. M. and Csuti, B. and Davis, F. W.},
	editor = {Decker, D. J. and Krasny, M. E. and Goff, G. R. and Smith, C. R. and Gross, D. W.}
}
@inbook {747,
	title = {Gap analysis: an application of Geographic Information Systems for wildlife species},
	booktitle = {Challenges in the Conservation of Biological Resources: A Practitioner{\textquoteright}s Guide},
	year = {1991},
	month = {1991},
	pages = {167-180},
	publisher = {Westview Press},
	organization = {Westview Press},
	address = {Boulder, Colorado},
	author = {Scott, J. M. and Csuti, B. and Davis, F. W.},
	editor = {Decker, D. J. and Krasny, M. E. and Goff, G. R. and Smith, C. R. and Gross, D. W.}
}
@inbook {749,
	title = {An information systems approach to the preservation of biological diversity},
	booktitle = {GIS Applications in Natural Resources},
	year = {1991},
	month = {1991},
	pages = {283-293},
	publisher = {GIS World, Inc.},
	organization = {GIS World, Inc.},
	address = {Ft. Collins, Colorado},
	author = {Scott, J. M. and Estes, J. E. and Scepan, J. and Davis, F. W. and Stoms, D. M.},
	editor = {Heit, M. and Shortreid, A.}
}
@inbook {503,
	title = {An information systems approach to the preservation of biological diversity},
	booktitle = {GIS Applications in Natural Resources},
	year = {1991},
	pages = {283-293},
	publisher = {GIS World, Inc.},
	organization = {GIS World, Inc.},
	address = {Ft. Collins, Colorado},
	author = {Scott, J. M. and Estes, J. E. and Scepan, J. and Davis, F. W. and Stoms, D. M.},
	editor = {Heit, M. and Shortreid, A.}
}
@article {397,
	title = {An information systems approach to the preservation of biological diversity},
	journal = {International Journal of Geographical Information Systems},
	volume = {4},
	number = {1},
	year = {1990},
	pages = {55-78},
	author = {Davis, F. W. and Stoms, D. M. and Estes, J. E. and Scepan, J. and Scott, J. M.}
}
