@article {400,
	title = {Natural resource condition assessment: John Muir National Historical Site},
	number = {Natural Resource Report NPS/NRR-2014/897},
	year = {2014},
	month = {12/2014},
	institution = {National Park Service},
	url = {https://irma.nps.gov/App/Reference/Profile/2218894},
	author = {Davis, F. W. and Stoms, D. M. and Jantz, P. A.}
}
@article {660,
	title = {Natural resource condition assessment: Pinnacles National Monument},
	year = {2013},
	month = {12/2013},
	institution = {National Park Service},
	address = {Fort Collins, Colorado},
	isbn = {Natural Resource Report NPS/PINN/NRR-2013/709},
	author = {Davis, F. W. and Stoms, D. M. and Jantz, P. A.}
}
@article {661,
	title = {Natural resource condition assessment: Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area},
	year = {2013},
	month = {12/2013},
	institution = {National Park Service},
	address = {Fort Collins, Colorado},
	isbn = {Natural Resource Report NPS/SAMO/NRR-2013/715},
	author = {Davis, F. W. and Stoms, D. M. and Jantz, P. A.}
}
@article {547,
	title = {Strategic targeting of agricultural conservation easements as a growth management tool},
	journal = {Land Use Policy},
	volume = {26},
	number = {4},
	year = {2009},
	note = {10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.004},
	pages = {1149-1161},
	abstract = {Public and private programs have preserved an estimated 730,000 ha of agricultural land in the United States, by acquiring agricultural conservation easements (ACEs) that retire a property{\textquoteright}s development rights. ACEs could be a potent tool for smart growth if strategically targeted. This paper attempts to quantify measures of strategic farmland preservation as guidance for planners. Evaluating the placement of 318 ACEs in the San Francisco Bay of California produced mixed results. Preservation and development of agricultural land were both in conformance with general plans. In contrast, we found little evidence of ACEs being used on a regional scale to reinforce urban growth boundaries. Recently ACEs have begun to coalesce into larger blocks of preserved agricultural land, but not near the rural-urban fringe. We encourage planners to consider farmland preservation as a politically-acceptable tool to complement traditional planning tools to minimize low-density sprawl.},
	keywords = {strategic conservation planning spatial targeting GIS smart growth farmland preservation urban growth boundaries},
	author = {Stoms, D. M. and Jantz, P. A. and Davis, F. W. and DeAngelo, G.}
}
@inbook {447,
	title = {Regulatory protection and conservation},
	booktitle = {California Grasslands: Ecology and Management},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {297-318},
	publisher = {University of California Press},
	organization = {University of California Press},
	address = {Berkeley},
	keywords = {grassland managed areas HCP NCCP CRP conservation easement general plans Williamson Act zoning ecosystem services incentives},
	author = {Jantz, P. A. and Preusser, B. F. L. and Fujikawa, J. K. and Kuhn, J. A. and Bersbach, C. J. and Gelbard, J. L. and Davis, F. W.},
	editor = {Stromberg, M. R. and Corbin, J. D. and D{\textquoteright}Antonio, C. M.}
}
@inbook {703,
	title = {Regulatory protection and conservation},
	booktitle = {California Grasslands: Ecology and Management},
	year = {2007},
	month = {2007},
	pages = {297-318},
	publisher = {University of California Press},
	organization = {University of California Press},
	address = {Berkeley},
	keywords = {conservation easement, CRP, ecosystem services, general plans, grassland, HCP, incentives, managed areas, NCCP, Williamson Act, zoning},
	author = {Jantz, P. A. and Preusser, B. F. L. and Fujikawa, J. K. and Kuhn, J. A. and Bersbach, C. J. and Gelbard, J. L. and Davis, F. W.},
	editor = {Stromberg, M. R. and Corbin, J. D. and D{\textquoteright}Antonio, C. M.}
}
