What's New
Research & Projects Publications
People
Data
Links

| Home | Contact | UCSB | Bren | ICESS |

 

Appendix CAS. The Cascade Ranges Region

 

Contributing Authors: David Stoms, Katherine Warner, and Frank Davis


Regional Character
Land Stewardship
Plant Community Types


Regional Character

Cascade


Figure CAS-1. Shaded relief image of the Cascade Ranges Region.

The volcanic Cascade Ranges Region (Figure CAS-1) encompasses 20,681 km² between the Oregon border on the north and the Sierra Nevada region on the south. The primary topographic features are the volcanic cones of Mount Shasta and Lassen Peak. The southern boundary near the North Fork of the Feather River is marked by the contact between the recent volcanic rock of the Cascades to the older metamorphics of the Sierra. Similarly, the boundary on the west with the Northwestern California region is a contact zone with predominantly metamorphic rock near the Sacramento River and Interstate 5. The Modoc Plateau region lies to the east in the rainshadow of the Cascades. South of Red Bluff, the region adjoins the Great Central Valley with its agriculture and California prairie community compared to the chaparral and foothill woodlands in the Cascades. Vegetation does not generally display distinct breaks at the geologically defined boundaries with the Sierra and Northwestern California and the climatically defined boundary with the Modoc Plateau.


Land Stewardship

Figure CAS-2 shows the management status of lands in the Cascade Ranges Region. Slightly less than half of the region is publicly owned, which is comparable to the state as a whole. The public ownership is widely distributed among U.S. Forest Service (37.5% of the total region), BLM (4.0%), Native American reservations (<0.1%), National Park Service (2.1%), state parks (0.1%), California Fish & Game (1.2%), and other state land (0.3%). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and other non-governmental organizations own 0.6% of the land area.

Cascade Ranges Region Managed Areas


Figure CAS-2. Management status of lands in the Cascade Ranges Region. See text for definitions of management levels.

The region has the third lowest proportion of lands in status 1 or 2 managed areas (Table CAS-1). At 7.1%, the Cascade Ranges region exceeds only the Modoc Plateau and the Great Central Valley. The predominant blocks of lands managed for biodiversity in the region are Lassen Volcanic National Park-Caribou Wilderness and the Ishi Wilderness/Tehama Wildlife Area/Gray Davis-Dye Creek Preserve complexes. The latter is one of the few large protected sites in the foothill zone of California.


Table CAS-1. Area and percentage of land surface by management status level of the Cascade Ranges Region.

Status Area (km²) %
1 1,095 5.3
2 380 1.8
3 7,921 38.5
4 11,187 54.4
Total 20,583 100.0

Elevation Bias in CAS Region


Figure CAS-3. Comparison of the proportion of managed areas with all lands in the Cascade Ranges Region by elevation zones.

The management levels are distributed unevenly across elevation zones (Figure CAS-3). In the two elevation zones below 1000 m, the proportions of management status 1 and 2 lands is similar to all lands in the region. Above 2000 m, the proportion that is managed for biodiversity far exceeds that for all lands. In the 1000-1500 m zone, however, only a very small proportion is protected. This elevational pattern reflects the protection of the higher mountains and the Ishi/Tehama/Gray Davis-Dye Creek complex in the foothills with very little protection at mid-elevations.

Plant Community Types

Floristic information was derived mainly from our own field surveys plus digital maps from the Lassen, Modoc, Klamath, and Shasta National Forests. Some species information was also obtained from a recent hardwoods inventory (Pacific Meridian Resources, unpublished 1996), the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project's mapping of Late Successional-Old Growth Forests (Franklin et al. 1996), the land cover map of the Eagle Lake Resource Area of the BLM (version dated January, 1996), the 1996 land cover map jointly produced from 1990 TM imagery by the USFS and California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Soil-Vegetation maps from the USFS and State of California, and unpublished maps from the VTM survey (Wieslander 1946). Site visits to 232 landscape units were also used to resolve conflicts between sources or to verify older information.

The land cover database for the Cascade Ranges Region consists of 685 landscape units, providing distributional information on 70 dominant plant species, 51 plant community types, and 10 other land use/cover types. Two community types were defined for CA-GAP­Low Sagebrush Scrub and Cercocarpus ledifolius Woodland. Average polygon size is approximately 3,000 ha.

Based on 1995 UCSB field surveys and on comparisons with independent sources of vegetation data, the vegetation map probably overestimates the extent of conifer forest types and underestimates the extent of shrubland and mid-elevational hardwood types. The northernmost and southernmost portions of the region were field checked most extensively. The central portion was only partially covered by the VTM surveys. Field mapping was least extensive in high elevation areas and sites around the northern arms of Lake Shasta which extend north and east along the McCloud and Pit river drainages and the east slope of the southern Cascades. Classification of Eastside versus Westside Ponderosa Pine Forest or Sierra Mixed Conifer Forest is not highly reliable when based solely on dominant canopy trees as was done for CA-GAP. Floristic information is generally more reliable on public lands than on private lands.


Table CAS-2. Percent area of each CNDDB community type at each management status level in the Cascade Ranges Region. * indicates an addition to the standard CNDDB classification (Holland 1986).

CNDDB Code CNDDB Community Name (Holland 1986) CNDDB Rank Status 1 % Status 2 % Status 3 % Status 4 % Total Mapped Distribution (km²) Status 1+2 %
35100 Great Basin Mixed Scrub S4 0.6 0.3 58.5 40.6 279.8 0.9
35210 Big Sagebrush Scrub S4 0.0 2.4 72.2 25.0 198.1 2.4
35211 Low Sagebrush Scrub * -- 0.0 0.0 48.7 51.3 7.8 0.0
35220 Subalpine Sagebrush Scrub S3.2 0.0 0.2 82.8 17.0 68.3 0.2
35400 Rabbitbrush Scrub S5 0.0 0.0 61.4 38.6 15.0 0.0
35500 Cercocarpus ledifolius Woodland * -- 1.5 0.1 46.2 52.2 39.9 1.6
37110 Northern Mixed Chaparral S4 25.3 8.4 29.6 36.7 37.4 33.7
37510 Mixed Montane Chaparral S4 1.5 0.0 25.3 73.2 52.9 1.5
37520 Montane Manzanita Chaparral S4 3.7 1.0 48.2 47.1 395.1 4.7
37530 Montane Ceanothus Chaparral S4/3.3 0.9 0.5 34.5 64.1 260.6 1.4
37541 Shin Oak Brush S3.3 4.1 7.1 51.5 37.3 128.1 11.2
37550 Bush Chinquapin Chaparral S3.3 14.8 0.0 47.6 37.6 92.1 14.8
37810 Buck Brush Chaparral S4 6.7 7.0 13.8 72.5 80.2 13.7
37A00 Interior Live Oak Chaparral S3.3 0.8 0.0 14.8 84.4 55.8 0.8
37E00 Mesic North Slope Chaparral S3.3 0.0 0.0 78.1 21.9 13.2 0.0
42200 Non-Native Grassland S4 0.4 1.8 2.7 95.1 527.4 2.2
43000 Great Basin Grassland S1.1 0.0 0.0 30.6 63.7 0.8 0.0
45100 Montane Meadow S3.2 0.0 0.7 39.0 60.3 105.4 0.7
45200 Subalpine or Alpine Meadow S3.2 0.6 15.4 48.8 35.0 47.8 16.0
61410 Great Valley Cottonwood Riparian Forest S2.1 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 2.5 0.0
61420 Great Valley Mixed Riparian Forest S2.2 17.7 2.5 1.3 78.5 18.8 20.2
61430 Great Valley Valley Oak Riparian Forest S1.1 0.0 0.0 4.6 95.4 4.2 0.0
61510 White Alder Riparian Forest S4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 13.8 0.0
61610 Modoc-Great Basin Cottonwood-Willow Riparian Forest S2.1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 11.4 0.0
63500 Montane Riparian Scrub S4 0.0 0.0 18.0 82.0 15.7 0.0
71110 Oregon Oak Woodland S3.3 0.2 0.9 28.9 70.0 223.3 1.1
71120 Black Oak Woodland S3.2 0.8 4.7 41.2 53.3 232.4 5.5
71130 Valley Oak Woodland S2.1 0.0 0.0 13.4 86.6 6.4 0.0
71140 Blue Oak Woodland S3.2 13.7 9.2 3.7 73.4 758.4 22.9
71150 Interior Live Oak Woodland S3.2 1.5 4.8 26.3 67.4 148.8 6.3
71310 Open Foothill Pine Woodland S4 11.5 7.8 8.8 71.8 622.1 19.3
71322 Non-Serpentine Foothill Pine Woodland S4 5.5 3.5 15.7 75.4 158.0 9.0
71410 Foothill Pine-Oak Woodland S4 4.3 1.0 8.1 86.6 843.4 5.3
71430 Juniper-Oak Cismontane Woodland S3.2 0.0 0.1 14.0 85.9 135.9 0.1
72100 Great Basin Woodlands S3.2/4 0.0 1.8 40.2 57.9 1,199.3 1.8
81320 Canyon Live Oak Forest S4 15.9 0.0 36.1 48.0 85.1 15.9
81330 Interior Live Oak Forest S4 0.0 1.1 35.1 63.8 64.5 1.1
81340 Black Oak Forest S4 2.3 0.1 40.6 56.9 473.6 2.4
81400 Tan-Oak Forest S4 0.0 0.3 62.0 37.7 11.7 0.3
83210 Knobcone Pine Forest S4 0.0 0.0 83.8 16.2 32.2 0.0
84210 Westside Ponderosa Pine Forest S2.1 4.4 1.1 45.3 49.2 2,347.3 5.5
84220 Eastside Ponderosa Pine Forest S2.1 2.4 1.5 60.6 35.5 1,821.5 3.9
84230 Sierran Mixed Coniferous Forest S4 2.1 0.4 39.4 58.1 5,507.1 2.5
84240 Sierran White Fir Forest S4 1.9 2.7 36.9 58.4 196.6 4.6
85100 Jeffrey Pine Forest S4 3.8 5.9 66.4 23.9 47.7 9.7
85210 Jeffrey Pine-Fir Forest S4 23.8 0.3 54.5 21.5 419.2 24.1
85310 Red Fir Forest S4 26.4 2.0 55.6 16.1 761.1 28.4
86100 Lodgepole Pine Forest S4 24.6 0.5 58.1 16.8 238.9 25.1
86210 Whitebark Pine-Mountain Hemlock Forest S4 48.2 0.0 19.0 32.8 52.4 48.2
86600 Whitebark Pine Forest S4 91.5 0.0 5.6 2.9 7.9 91.5
91110 Klamath-Cascade Fell-field S4 94.1 0.0 4.8 1.1 54.1 94.1

Regional Total-Natural Communities




18,921.2

Regional Total (incl nonvegetated)
5.3 1.8 38.5 54.4 20,679 7.1

We call attention to three categories of poor representation and one in which types appear to be well protected. Table CAS-2 gives the area of mapped distribution and proportions in each management level for every community type.

1. Plant community types occurring mainly on status 4 lands. Only Non-Native Grassland has a mapped area greater than 25 km² in the region with more than 90% in status 4 lands (primarily privately owned). This type mostly occurs in the lower elevations adjacent to the Great Central Valley. Interior Live Oak Chaparral, Foothill Pine-Oak Woodland, and Juniper-Oak Woodland have greater than 80% in status 4. The Juniper-Oak Woodland type is composed of California juniper with shrubby blue oak. It is generally restricted to the Inner Coast Ranges between Ventura County and Mt. Diablo (Holland 1986), and its occurrence north of Red Bluff near the region boundary is an unusual outlier from the main distribution.

2. Scrub, chaparral, and herbaceous types mainly located in unprotected areas. Virtually all of the Great Basin scrub communities (Great Basin Mixed Scrub, Big Sagebrush Scrub, Subalpine Sagebrush Scrub, and Cercocarpus ledifolius Woodland) and the montane chaparral types (Mixed Montane Chaparral, Montane Manzanita Chaparral, and Montane Ceanothus Chaparral) are poorly represented in status 1 or 2 managed areas of the Cascade Ranges region (all under 5%). Interior Live Oak Chaparral, Non-Native Grassland, and Montane Meadows have similar low representation. The concerns for most of these types are the potential impacts of grazing and invasions of exotic plant species on native ecosystems. Interior Live Oak Chaparral, Mixed Montane Chaparral, and Subalpine Sagebrush Scrub, however, occur more extensively in other regions.

3. Forest and woodland types mainly located in unprotected areas. Most of the woodland and lower elevation forest types have low levels of representation in this region. These include Oregon Oak Woodland, Interior Live Oak Woodland and Forest, Black Oak Woodland and Forest, Non-Serpentine Foothill Pine Woodland, Foothill Pine-Oak Woodland, and Juniper-Oak Cismontane Woodland of the broadleaf or mixed types. The conifer types that are poorly represented are the Great Basin Woodlands on the eastern side of the region and Knobcone Pine Forest, Westside and Eastside Ponderosa Pine Forest, Sierran Mixed Coniferous Forest, Sieran White Fir Forest, and Jeffrey Pine Forest. These types are of management concern because timber harvest and/or grazing prevail on both public and private lands where these communities occur. Blue Oak Woodland and Open Foothill Pine Woodland tend to be poorly represented in managed areas in other parts of the state, but in the Cascades, relatively high percentages of their distributions occur in the large complex (Ishi/Tehama/Gray Davis-Dye Creek) of low elevation managed areas.

4. Community types that appear well-protected. Five community types in this region are relatively well-represented (i.e., > 25% in status 1 or 2). Most of these are the upper montane, subalpine, or alpine types (Red Fir, Lodgepole, and Whitebark Pine-Mountain Hemlock Forests and Klamath-Cascades Fell-field). This pattern reflects the high proportion of land at higher elevations managed as wilderness or national park in this region. The other well-represented type is Northern Mixed Chaparral.


CA-GAP Home | Overview | Report | Download GIS | CD-ROM | Site Index | National GAP

Top of Page

Send your comments to: stoms@geog.ucsb.edu

UCSB Biogeography Lab Home

Email stoms@bren.ucsb.edu